Azharuddin dating badminton player 3smc online dating
Over several years, refinements were made to clarify where the ball should pitch and to remove the element of interpreting the batsman's intentions.
The 1839 version of the law used a wording that remained in place for nearly 100 years.
The ambiguity of the wording was highlighted when two prominent umpires disagreed over whether the ball had to travel in a straight line from the bowler to the wicket, or between the wickets at either end of the pitch.
In 1839 the MCC, by then responsible for drafting the Laws of Cricket, endorsed the latter interpretation and ruled the batsman out lbw if the ball pitched in between the wickets and would have hit the stumps.
Statistics reveal that the probability of a batsman being dismissed lbw in a Test match varies depending on where the match is played and which teams are playing.
in line with the wickets and have been going on to hit the stumps.
Critics felt this change made the game unattractive as it encouraged negative tactics at the expense of leg spin bowling.
After considerable debate and various experiments, the law was changed again in 1972.
However, he cannot be lbw if the ball pitches on the leg side of the stumps ("outside leg stump"), However, some shots in cricket, such as the switch hit or reverse sweep, involve the batsman switching between a right- and left-handed stance; this affects the location of the off and leg side, which are determined by the stance.Owing to its complexity, the law is widely misunderstood among the general public and has proven controversial among spectators, administrators and commentators; lbw decisions have sometimes caused crowd trouble.Since the law's introduction, the proportion of lbw dismissals has risen steadily through the years.Subsequently, some players deliberately began to obstruct the ball from hitting the wickets.
Such tactics were criticised by writers and a revision of the laws in 1774 ruled that the batsman was out if he deliberately stopped the ball from hitting the wicket with his leg.Until then, batsmen used their pads only to protect their legs; their use for any other purposes was considered unsporting, and some amateur cricketers did not wear them at all.